Lingqian · Foundations

Chinese Fortune Stick Systems Compared

Compare Guanyin, Mazu, Guandi, Wong Tai Sin, and Japanese omikuji by institution, corpus, ritual, fields, and source identity without ranking accuracy.

Core names
Lingqian · Kau chim · Chinese fortune sticks · Chinese lot systems · Fortune stick corpus comparison

Catalog reference updated: · Maintained by OpenFate · Editorial Methodology

Overview

Similar-looking numbered fortunes can belong to different deities, institutions, corpus sizes, texts, grades, and rituals. Comparison begins with named sources and identifying fields, not with a shared English label.

At a glance

Page role
Topic hub
Evidence basis
Government, scholarly, and recension sources
Reading rule
Separate the printed text from your contextual inference.
Editorial state
Editorial review draft · 2026-09-12

Explore concepts

Direct answer

Similar-looking numbered fortunes can belong to different deities, institutions, corpus sizes, texts, grades, and rituals. Comparison begins with named sources and identifying fields, not with a shared English label.

A reliable method

For each system, record the official institution, corpus size, numbering, poem or slip format, confirmation procedure, grade scheme, and local variation. Compare only dimensions the sources actually expose.

  • Name the exact corpus or temple version.
  • Separate the printed text from your contextual inference.
  • Choose one observable, reversible next action.

Worked example

A Guanyin number 12 and a Guandi number 12 are not parallel readings merely because both are twelfth. Their poem text and corpus ownership identify separate entries.

Close misreading and alternative

Ranking which system is “more accurate” would require controlled outcome evidence not provided by temple or corpus pages. Cultural prominence is also not predictive validity.

Sources and limits

Similar-looking numbered fortunes can belong to different deities, institutions, corpus sizes, texts, grades, and rituals. Comparison begins with named sources and identifying fields, not with a shared English label. For each system, record the official institution, corpus size, numbering, poem or slip format, confirmation procedure, grade scheme, and local variation. Compare only dimensions the sources actually expose. Government and scholar-authored references support terminology and cultural structure, while the pinned OpenFate snapshot identifies only the product recension used on these pages. Treat the text as a structured reflection prompt. It cannot verify hidden thoughts, diagnose health, decide legal or financial risk, or guarantee an event or date. Every factual claim stays traceable to a named source reference, while examples show the method rather than establish what will happen. Conflicts, omissions, and version limits remain visible for audit.

Sources and editorial basis

  1. OpenFate Guanyin 100-lot recension contract
    app/modules/lingqian/logic/data/canon.ts: QIAN_CANON; data/provenance.ts: QIAN_CORPUS_PROVENANCE version guanyin-100-openfate-2026-07-30The pinned product repository establishes only the exact fields and recension shown here. It does not establish universal temple practice, historical truth, or predictive validity.
  2. 國史館臺灣文獻館:臺灣民俗文物辭典・籤詩
    「籤詩」entry, ID 891: system sizes, temple-specific corpora, literary materials, and contextual interpretationA Taiwan government reference describing 60-, 64-, and 100-lot families, temple-specific corpora, literary sources, and contextual interpretation.
  3. 新北市政府:常用籤詩解密與參拜求法
    dataserno 201611090011: common lot systems, one-question guidance, three 聖筊, and reference-not-determinism noteGovernment cultural guidance covering common Taiwan lot systems, one question per draw, three sheng jiao confirmation, and a reference-not-determinism boundary.

Search the Wiki