Liu Yao Question Types and Yongshen
Liu Yao question types organize one role and decision. OpenFate supports six bounded categories without claiming to cover every life event.
Overview
OpenFate’s current Liu Yao contract groups questions into self and action, official duty, wealth and exchange, counterpart and relationship, recovery, and document or result. Each category narrows a focus role and safety boundary; it is an interface taxonomy, not a promise that the chart can determine the external outcome.
At a glance
- Reader question
- liu yao question types and yongshen
- Evidence model
- Fixed chart facts → attributed tradition → conditional interpretation
- Product boundary
- OpenFate /liuyao owns interactive casting and chart generation
- Review posture
- Source-backed reference · interpretation remains conditional
Explore concepts
- Liu Yao learning guide
Liu Yao for Personal Response and Next Steps
liu yao for personal response and next steps: reproducible rules, a worked check, common errors, sources, and interpretation limits.
Read definition - Liu Yao learning guide
Liu Yao for Career and Responsibility Questions
liu yao for career and responsibility questions: reproducible rules, a worked check, common errors, sources, and interpretation limits.
Read definition - Liu Yao learning guide
Liu Yao for Wealth and Exchange Questions
liu yao for wealth and exchange questions: reproducible rules, a worked check, common errors, sources, and interpretation limits.
Read definition - Liu Yao learning guide
Liu Yao for Counterpart and Relationship Questions
liu yao for counterpart and relationship questions: reproducible rules, a worked check, common errors, sources, and interpretation limits.
Read definition - Liu Yao learning guide
Liu Yao for Recovery Questions: Safe Boundaries
liu yao for recovery questions safe boundaries: reproducible rules, a worked check, common errors, sources, and interpretation limits.
Read definition - Liu Yao learning guide
Liu Yao for Documents, Exams and Results
liu yao for documents exams and results: reproducible rules, a worked check, common errors, sources, and interpretation limits.
Read definition
Direct answer
OpenFate’s current Liu Yao contract groups questions into self and action, official duty, wealth and exchange, counterpart and relationship, recovery, and document or result. Each category narrows a focus role and safety boundary; it is an interface taxonomy, not a promise that the chart can determine the external outcome.
Definitions and prerequisites
State the decision owner, concrete object, time window and evidence needed outside the chart. Split questions that contain two actors, two outcomes or both diagnosis and action before choosing Yongshen.
Method or reference rule
Select the closest supported category, record its focus rule, identify eligible lines and perform the normal strength and conflict audit. End with a controllable next step and a fact that would revise the reading.
Worked example
For a contract approval, the document/result category can focus the relevant Parents line while the real verification remains the signed document or official notice. The chart organizes attention; it does not replace the record.
Closest failure case
Treating recovery as a diagnosis, wealth/exchange as a trade signal, or counterpart as secret-mind reading exceeds the category. Creating a new category only to force a preferred focus also breaks comparability.
Sources, interpretation and limits
Application pages must never give medical diagnosis, medication advice, legal conclusions, gambling strategies or specific investment instructions. Use qualified evidence and direct consent for the real decision.
The historical manual documents named focus roles and cases; OpenFate documents its six current question contracts. Neither establishes a future outcome.
Verification checklist
Save the question, cast time, timezone, face convention, six line values, source edition and product version whenever they can change the result.
- Reproduce the six stored line values before interpretation.
- Name the method, edition and product settings used.
- Cite the decisive chart facts instead of one dramatic label.
- Use observable records and qualified advice for high-stakes decisions.
Sources and editorial basis
- Wikisource: 增刪卜易《增刪卜易》 chapter 9, “用神元神忌神仇神章第九,” definition and worked 乾為天 case; historical application framework only.Public-domain digitization with named chapters on casting, Eight-Palace names, Yongshen and worked cases. Editorial additions in the digitization must not be silently attributed to the historical author.
- OpenFate Liu Yao deterministic chart contractOpenFate app/modules/liuyao/logic/topics.ts: six supported question-topic contracts and their focus roles; not an outcome guarantee.Product evidence for seeded six-line casting and the current deterministic chart fields and policies. It supports current behavior only, not historical priority or predictive truth.
- OpenFate Editorial MethodologyOpenFate Editorial Methodology, stable sections #editorial-principles, #editorial-workflow, #editorial-ai and #editorial-context. Page claim scope: 按OpenFate六類題目連結用神選取與安全界線，不窮舉所有人生情境。OpenFate separates deterministic chart calculation, traditional interpretation, and modern editorial explanation.