Fortune Stick Ethics, Safety, and Privacy
Use Lingqian without exposing private data, claiming access to another person’s mind, or replacing medical, legal, financial, or crisis support.
Overview
Ethical use keeps agency with the questioner. Ask about actions and evidence they can observe, minimize personal data, avoid diagnosing or surveilling others, and stop when the issue requires emergency or professional support.
At a glance
- Page role
- Focused guide
- Evidence basis
- Documented practice with explicit validity limits
- Reading rule
- Separate the printed text from your contextual inference.
- Editorial state
- Editorial review draft · 2026-09-12
Direct answer
Ethical use keeps agency with the questioner. Ask about actions and evidence they can observe, minimize personal data, avoid diagnosing or surveilling others, and stop when the issue requires emergency or professional support.
A reliable method
Remove unnecessary names and identifiers, frame one bounded question, state uncertainty, offer an alternative reading, and end with a reversible action. Do not infer consent, loyalty, pregnancy, illness, guilt, market direction, or guaranteed timing.
- Name the exact corpus or temple version.
- Separate the printed text from your contextual inference.
- Choose one observable, reversible next action.
Worked example
Instead of “Is my partner secretly cheating?”, ask “What observable conversation and boundary do I need before deciding whether this relationship feels trustworthy?” The revised question does not pretend the lot reveals private facts.
Close misreading and alternative
Replacing a diagnosis with “energy” language is still unsafe if it changes treatment. Likewise, calling a wager “entertainment” does not make betting instructions appropriate.
Sources and limits
Ethical use keeps agency with the questioner. Ask about actions and evidence they can observe, minimize personal data, avoid diagnosing or surveilling others, and stop when the issue requires emergency or professional support. Remove unnecessary names and identifiers, frame one bounded question, state uncertainty, offer an alternative reading, and end with a reversible action. Do not infer consent, loyalty, pregnancy, illness, guilt, market direction, or guaranteed timing. Available sources document practice, text, and interpretive context; they do not provide controlled evidence that a lot predicts outcomes. High-stakes decisions need independent evidence and qualified help. Treat the text as a structured reflection prompt. It cannot verify hidden thoughts, diagnose health, decide legal or financial risk, or guarantee an event or date. Every factual claim stays traceable to a named source reference, while examples show the method rather than establish what will happen. Conflicts, omissions, and version limits remain visible for audit.
Sources and editorial basis
- OpenFate Guanyin 100-lot recension contractapp/modules/lingqian/logic/data/canon.ts: QIAN_CANON; data/provenance.ts: QIAN_CORPUS_PROVENANCE version guanyin-100-openfate-2026-07-30The pinned product repository establishes only the exact fields and recension shown here. It does not establish universal temple practice, historical truth, or predictive validity.
- 國史館臺灣文獻館：臺灣民俗文物辭典・籤詩「籤詩」entry, ID 891: system sizes, temple-specific corpora, literary materials, and contextual interpretationA Taiwan government reference describing 60-, 64-, and 100-lot families, temple-specific corpora, literary sources, and contextual interpretation.
- 科技大觀園：籤詩文化與科學邏輯Article C000003/53466466: discussion of lot-poem structure and historical, literary, dramatic, legendary, and folk-story materialsA scholar-authored public article used for lot-poem anatomy and the role of stories from history, novels, drama, legend, and folklore—not as evidence of predictive accuracy.
- 新北市政府：常用籤詩解密與參拜求法dataserno 201611090011: common lot systems, one-question guidance, three 聖筊, and reference-not-determinism noteGovernment cultural guidance covering common Taiwan lot systems, one question per draw, three sheng jiao confirmation, and a reference-not-determinism boundary.
- OpenFate oracle safety contractapp/modules/shared/oracle/safety.ts and question-draft-policy.ts: medical, legal, gambling, investment, self-harm, privacy, and deterministic-future boundariesThe product contract blocks diagnostic, legal, gambling, investment, self-harm, and deterministic-future instructions and requires one real, bounded user question.