Liu Yao vs Meihua Yishu
liu yao vs meihua yishu: reproducible rules, a worked check, common errors, sources, and interpretation limits.
Overview
Liu Yao and Meihua Yishu both work with hexagrams but use different default pipelines. Liu Yao builds six line values and a Najia chart; Meihua commonly derives primary, mutual, and changed hexagrams with body–use relations from numbers or events. The page distinguishes reproducible structure from conditional interpretation and gives one concrete check that can be independently repeated.
At a glance
- Reader question
- liu yao vs meihua yishu
- Evidence model
- Fixed chart facts → attributed tradition → conditional interpretation
- Product boundary
- OpenFate /liuyao owns interactive casting and chart generation
- Review posture
- Source-backed reference · interpretation remains conditional
Direct answer
Liu Yao and Meihua Yishu both work with hexagrams but use different default pipelines. Liu Yao builds six line values and a Najia chart; Meihua commonly derives primary, mutual, and changed hexagrams with body–use relations from numbers or events. The page distinguishes reproducible structure from conditional interpretation and gives one concrete check that can be independently repeated.
Definitions and prerequisites
Before applying the rule, preserve the bounded question, six bottom-up line values, casting time, timezone, day-boundary policy, and named source convention. If an input is missing, stop at definition rather than filling the gap symbolically. Liu Yao and Meihua Yishu both work with hexagrams but use different default pipelines. Liu Yao builds six line values and a Najia chart; Meihua commonly derives primary, mutual, and changed hexagrams with body–use relations from numbers or events.
Method or reference rule
Use this auditable procedure: Compare the actual input, moving-line rule, palace or body–use calculation, time layer, and evidence output. Never import a Meihua body trigram into Liu Yao Yongshen selection or add Najia rows to a Meihua result without declaring a hybrid. Save the input, intermediate rows, applicable source locator, product version, and any uncertainty before weighing an interpretive effect.
Worked example
Worked check: A timestamp converted to numbers may generate a Meihua hexagram and one moving line. Six recorded coin sums generate a Liu Yao chart; equal hexagram names do not make the downstream calculation identical. Save the input, intermediate rows, applicable source locator, product version, and any uncertainty before weighing an interpretive effect.
Closest failure case
The closest failure case for Liu Yao vs Meihua Yishu is to retain its memorable label while dropping the inputs, direction, source rule, or conflicting evidence. That shortcut cannot be reproduced and can turn a conditional classification into an unsupported prediction.
Sources, interpretation and limits
Liu Yao and Meihua Yishu both work with hexagrams but use different default pipelines. Liu Yao builds six line values and a Najia chart; Meihua commonly derives primary, mutual, and changed hexagrams with body–use relations from numbers or events. Keep fixed chart output, attributed historical rules, editorial interpretation, and real-world evidence in separate layers. This reference cannot establish hidden thoughts, causation, or a guaranteed future outcome; medical, legal, financial, and safety decisions require direct evidence and qualified help.
Chinese, Japanese and Korean records show overlapping local labels. A shared catalogue entry is terminology evidence, not proof that every lineage uses the words identically.
Verification checklist
Save the question, cast time, timezone, face convention, six line values, source edition and product version whenever they can change the result.
- Reproduce the six stored line values before interpretation.
- Name the method, edition and product settings used.
- Cite the decisive chart facts instead of one dramatic label.
- Use observable records and qualified advice for high-stakes decisions.
Sources and editorial basis
- OpenFate Liu Yao deterministic chart contractOpenFate code audit 2026-09-12: app/modules/liuyao/logic/cast.ts, data.ts, engine.ts, evidence.ts, types.ts and topics.ts; current product behavior only.Product evidence for seeded six-line casting and the current deterministic chart fields and policies. It supports current behavior only, not historical priority or predictive truth.
- OpenFate Meihua implementation contractOpenFate Meihua product page and deterministic method contract; compared only at workflow and input-model level. Page claim scope: 比較起卦輸入、納甲層與體用互卦層，避免把兩者規則混算。Repository documentation and deterministic logic define the current time and two-number modes, derivations, boundaries, and methodology version. They establish repository behavior, not deployment state, historical universality, or predictive validity.
- OpenFate Editorial MethodologyOpenFate Editorial Methodology, stable sections #editorial-principles, #editorial-workflow, #editorial-ai and #editorial-context. Page claim scope: 比較起卦輸入、納甲層與體用互卦層，避免把兩者規則混算。OpenFate separates deterministic chart calculation, traditional interpretation, and modern editorial explanation.