Liu Yao learning guide

Liu Yao vs Qimen Dunjia

liu yao vs qimen dunjia: reproducible rules, a worked check, common errors, sources, and interpretation limits.

Names and useful aliases
liu yao vs qimen dunjia · Liu Yao vs Qimen Dunjia · liu yao vs qimen dunjia guide · Liu Yao vs Qimen Dunjia Liu Yao reference · Liu Yao vs Qimen Dunjia explained

Catalog reference updated: · Maintained by OpenFate · Editorial Methodology

Overview

Liu Yao uses a vertical six-line hexagram chart; Qimen Dunjia uses a time-and-space board with palaces and multiple symbols. Their inputs, data structures, and question granularity differ even when both include stems and branches. The page distinguishes reproducible structure from conditional interpretation and gives one concrete check that can be independently repeated.

At a glance

Reader question
liu yao vs qimen dunjia
Evidence model
Fixed chart facts → attributed tradition → conditional interpretation
Product boundary
OpenFate /liuyao owns interactive casting and chart generation
Review posture
Source-backed reference · interpretation remains conditional

Direct answer

Liu Yao uses a vertical six-line hexagram chart; Qimen Dunjia uses a time-and-space board with palaces and multiple symbols. Their inputs, data structures, and question granularity differ even when both include stems and branches. The page distinguishes reproducible structure from conditional interpretation and gives one concrete check that can be independently repeated.

Definitions and prerequisites

Before applying the rule, preserve the bounded question, six bottom-up line values, casting time, timezone, day-boundary policy, and named source convention. If an input is missing, stop at definition rather than filling the gap symbolically. Liu Yao uses a vertical six-line hexagram chart; Qimen Dunjia uses a time-and-space board with palaces and multiple symbols. Their inputs, data structures, and question granularity differ even when both include stems and branches.

Method or reference rule

Use this auditable procedure: Compare cast versus calendrical input, six positions versus nine palaces, Najia relations versus Qimen layers, and each product’s deterministic contract. A shared Han term does not authorize cross-system substitution. Save the input, intermediate rows, applicable source locator, product version, and any uncertainty before weighing an interpretive effect.

Worked example

Worked check: A Liu Yao line can carry a Najia stem-branch and Six Relative. A Qimen palace can contain stems, star, door, deity, and other board relations; copying one label across loses its structural owner. Save the input, intermediate rows, applicable source locator, product version, and any uncertainty before weighing an interpretive effect.

Closest failure case

The closest failure case for Liu Yao vs Qimen Dunjia is to retain its memorable label while dropping the inputs, direction, source rule, or conflicting evidence. That shortcut cannot be reproduced and can turn a conditional classification into an unsupported prediction.

Sources, interpretation and limits

Liu Yao uses a vertical six-line hexagram chart; Qimen Dunjia uses a time-and-space board with palaces and multiple symbols. Their inputs, data structures, and question granularity differ even when both include stems and branches. Keep fixed chart output, attributed historical rules, editorial interpretation, and real-world evidence in separate layers. This reference cannot establish hidden thoughts, causation, or a guaranteed future outcome; medical, legal, financial, and safety decisions require direct evidence and qualified help.

Chinese, Japanese and Korean records show overlapping local labels. A shared catalogue entry is terminology evidence, not proof that every lineage uses the words identically.

Verification checklist

Save the question, cast time, timezone, face convention, six line values, source edition and product version whenever they can change the result.

  • Reproduce the six stored line values before interpretation.
  • Name the method, edition and product settings used.
  • Cite the decisive chart facts instead of one dramatic label.
  • Use observable records and qualified advice for high-stakes decisions.

Sources and editorial basis

  1. OpenFate Liu Yao deterministic chart contract
    OpenFate code audit 2026-09-12: app/modules/liuyao/logic/cast.ts, data.ts, engine.ts, evidence.ts, types.ts and topics.ts; current product behavior only.Product evidence for seeded six-line casting and the current deterministic chart fields and policies. It supports current behavior only, not historical priority or predictive truth.
  2. OpenFate Qimen hour-chart method
    OpenFate Qimen hour-method product contract; compared only at workflow, time-input and chart-output level. Page claim scope: 比較六爻線性卦盤與奇門時空盤的輸入、資料結構與問題粒度。Product-specific reference for OpenFate’s fixed-offset civil-time, hour-Qimen, rotating-plate, Chaibu implementation and its deterministic chart fields. A source review on 2026-09-12 does not prove live deployment, other schools, or predictive validity.
  3. OpenFate Editorial Methodology
    OpenFate Editorial Methodology, stable sections #editorial-principles, #editorial-workflow, #editorial-ai and #editorial-context. Page claim scope: 比較六爻線性卦盤與奇門時空盤的輸入、資料結構與問題粒度。OpenFate separates deterministic chart calculation, traditional interpretation, and modern editorial explanation.
Was this article helpful?

Search the Wiki