Library
Useful Gods · Arbitration

Priority among Multiple Useful Gods (多個用神的優先級)

Rank multiple Useful-God candidates by prerequisite, urgency, operational access, side effects, chart layer, and method instead of publishing an unexplained list.

Simplified Chinese
多个用神的优先级
Traditional Chinese
多個用神的優先級
Pinyin
Duōge Yòngshén de Yōuxiānjí
Also known as
Useful God ranking · multiple useful-role priority

Editorially reviewed:

Overview

Priority among Multiple Useful Gods (多個用神的優先級) is determined by function, not by a fixed universal element order. Candidates may address different problems or stages: one can restore climate, another mediate a conflict, and another support a pattern after the first condition is met. Rank them by declared method, prerequisite, urgency, availability, reach, net benefit, side effects, and chart layer, while preserving uncertainty and alternative routes.

At a glance

Primary basis
The most necessary executable function
Prerequisite
Some roles must operate before others become useful
Availability
Presence, support, access, and protection affect rank
Side effects
A solution that breaks another essential route ranks lower
Layer
Natal, Luck Pillar, and annual roles remain separate
Output
Rank, reasons, conditions, and alternatives

Separate candidates by the problem they solve

List the diagnostic problem, proposed function, method, and target for each candidate.

Do not collapse several phases into a vague favorable-elements list when they serve different mechanisms.

  • Create one function record per candidate.
  • Do not mix methods silently.

Apply prerequisite and availability gates

A climate prerequisite or broken mediation path may need attention before ordinary balancing can matter.

Then check whether each candidate is present, rooted, exposed, connected, protected, and timely enough to act.

  • Resolve prerequisites first.
  • Reject unavailable candidates.

Compare net benefit and side effects

Measure what each candidate improves, what it consumes, and which essential structures it might damage.

Publish co-primary or conditional roles when evidence does not justify a single winner.

  • Use net rather than gross effect.
  • Allow ties and conditional ranks.

Keep the ranking auditable and non-predictive

Record the method, evidence, counterevidence, chart layer, period, and confidence for every rank.

Priority does not guarantee favorable events or prescribe real-world choices.

  • Expose provenance.
  • No event or advice guarantee.

Sources and editorial basis

  1. 《子平真詮》 (True Explanations of Ziping)
    《子平真詮》格局成敗與救應可同時需要主用與輔助條件，但核心破格點應先於次要增益處理A major reference for month-command, structure, and contextual Bazi interpretation.
  2. 《滴天髓》 (Dripping Heavenly Marrow)
    《滴天髓》體用源流論支持按主要失衡、可達路徑與淨效果排序，而非把多個候選五行並列為同級答案A core later text on Bazi balance, seasonal strength, and relational reading.
  3. OpenFate Editorial Methodology
    多個用神優先級頁公開排序標準、衝突處理與備選條件，禁止只列顏色或元素清單OpenFate separates deterministic chart calculation, traditional interpretation, and modern editorial explanation.
Was this article helpful?

Search the Wiki