Evidence Boundaries for Useful-God Selection (喜用神判斷的證據邊界)
Separate deterministic chart facts, traditional selection rules, school policy, uncertainty, and unsupported life claims in every Useful-God conclusion.
Overview
Evidence Boundaries for Useful-God Selection (喜用神判斷的證據邊界) require every conclusion to separate birth-data calculation, chart facts, interpretive method, role selection, timing overlays, and real-world claims. A defensible page shows the target problem, candidate function, supporting and opposing evidence, operational path, alternatives, school dependence, and confidence. It does not present traditional correspondence as scientific causation or professional advice.
At a glance
- Layer 1
- Birth inputs, time policy, and deterministic pillars
- Layer 2
- Observable chart relations and derived structural facts
- Layer 3
- Declared school method and selection policy
- Layer 4
- Timing availability with explicit duration
- Required output
- Evidence, counterevidence, alternatives, and confidence
- Excluded claims
- Scientific causation and professional guarantees
Lock deterministic inputs and chart facts
Record birth date, time, location, time zone, solar-time policy, year and day boundaries, and resulting pillars before interpretation.
Keep direct chart facts—stems, branches, hidden stems, roots, and relations—separate from their meaning.
- Make inputs reproducible.
- Separate fact from interpretation.
Declare the selection method and policy
Name whether the conclusion uses strength, pattern, climate, mediation, remedy, special structure, or a ranked combination.
Publish formation rules, prerequisites, conflict resolution, school variance, and what would falsify the result.
- Name the method.
- Expose disqualifiers and alternatives.
Show the complete operating path and confidence
Trace presence, season, roots, exposure, source, target, protection, damage, timing, and net effect for every selected role.
Use bounded confidence and preserve unresolved alternatives rather than manufacturing precision.
- Audit source-to-target continuity.
- Avoid false percentages.
Keep life claims outside unsupported evidence
A Useful-God conclusion does not establish medical, legal, financial, psychological, relationship, safety, or career facts and is not scientific proof of causation.
Use it as cultural interpretation or reflection, with direct evidence and qualified advice for consequential decisions.
- No professional-advice substitution.
- No guaranteed event or remedy.
Sources and editorial basis
- 《子平真詮》 (True Explanations of Ziping)《子平真詮》月令、格局、成敗與救應提供可列示的取用證據鏈，也揭示不同前提會產生不同結論A major reference for month-command, structure, and contextual Bazi interpretation.
- 《滴天髓》 (Dripping Heavenly Marrow)《滴天髓》旺衰、氣勢、源流、寒暖燥濕要求全局互證，支持保留反證與不確定性而非單字裁決A core later text on Bazi balance, seasonal strength, and relational reading.
- OpenFate Editorial Methodology喜用神證據邊界頁分離輸入、盤面事實、方法權重、替代解釋與生活主張，排除科學因果及專業建議保證OpenFate separates deterministic chart calculation, traditional interpretation, and modern editorial explanation.