Day-Master Strength in Bazi Cases
Assess Day-Master strength in cases with seasonal, root, support, pressure, transformation, circulation, and sensitivity evidence rather than character counts.
Overview
A case should show how the Day-Master strength conclusion was reached, not merely label the chart strong or weak. Record Month Command and seasonal phase, roots and their availability, revealed and hidden support, companions, output, wealth, control, combinations, transformations, distance, and effective circulation. Separate gross presence from usable effect and publish both supporting and opposing evidence. If a score is used, expose its rubric and sensitivity. Test borderline, extremely strong, extremely weak, and following candidates under the chosen school. Strength is a chart-model relation and does not measure the person’s body, willpower, competence, status, or resilience.
At a glance
- Seasonal evidence
- Month Command, phase, and seasonal depth
- Support evidence
- Roots, revelation, hidden support, and companions
- Pressure evidence
- Output, wealth, control, and effective relations
- Modifiers
- Combination, transformation, distance, obstruction, and flow
- Required output
- Evidence ledger, classification, sensitivity, and alternatives
- Not measured
- Body, willpower, competence, resilience, status, or worth
Fix the reference and school
State that the reference is the Day Master, identify the strength scale and school, and define strong, weak, extreme, and following thresholds before examining the result.
Do not move thresholds to fit the case outcome. If several schools are compared, run each rubric independently.
- Predefine categories and thresholds.
- Keep schools separately reproducible.
Build a directional evidence ledger
List seasonal support, each root, revealed and hidden allies, companions, output, wealth, control, and how relations redirect or block them. Record source, position, and direction.
Do not count characters as equally effective. Distinguish presence, rootedness, availability, transformation, and actual participation in the configuration.
- Trace every contribution.
- Separate presence from effective action.
Test edge cases and alternate classifications
Evaluate whether a disputed root, birth-time scenario, combination, month-boundary change, or weighting policy changes the category. Show the smallest material change.
For following candidates, test disqualifying support and the ability to conform rather than treating “very weak” as sufficient. Preserve unresolved cases.
- Publish sensitivity and reversal conditions.
- Test extreme categories separately.
Do not translate strength into human strength
The classification describes relative chart support and pressure. It does not establish health, stamina, dominance, confidence, intelligence, survival ability, or moral character.
Use direct evidence for personal and professional decisions. A case may illustrate the technical classification, not validate a life stereotype.
- No body or personality inference.
- No ranking of people.
Sources and editorial basis
- 《滴天髓》 (Dripping Heavenly Marrow)《滴天髓》及註本的月令、根氣、旺衰、源流與制化材料提供案例強弱判定的全局證據A core later text on Bazi balance, seasonal strength, and relational reading.
- 《子平真詮》 (True Explanations of Ziping)《子平真詮》的月令、格局、喜忌與救應說明旺衰須與結構功能交叉檢查，不能只數五行字數A major reference for month-command, structure, and contextual Bazi interpretation.
- OpenFate Editorial Methodology案例強弱頁公開支持、壓力、門檻、敏感度與反轉條件，禁止將命盤強弱等同身體、意志、能力或人的價值OpenFate separates deterministic chart calculation, traditional interpretation, and modern editorial explanation.